An Analysis of Mead, Mead Making
and the Role of its Primary Constituents
Daniel S. McConnell and Kenneth D. Schramm*
Technical Director,
G.W.Kent and President, The Yeast Culture Kit Company
*Director, The Mazer Cup Mead Competition
From the bonny bells of heather,
They brewed a drink long-syne,
Was sweeter far than honey,
Was stronger far than wine.
They brewed it and they drank it,
And lay in blessed swound
For days and days together
In their dwellings underground.
R.L. Stevenson
Heather Ale
PART 1: AN ANALYSIS OF HONEY
Since such a tremendous part of the character of mead is
derived from the honey we use,
we thought that we should first take a look at honey, and
then concentrate on those
variables and components that we can control which might
improve our mead making.
For the purposes of brevity, when we discuss the values of
honey, those values are based
on averages determined in an analysis of 490 samples of honey
conducted by the Honey
Investigations Unit of the Plant Products Laboratory of the
U.S.D.A. This information was
collected and published by Dr. Jonathan W. White[1,2], who was
the chief of the Plant
Products Lab, and to whom we owe credit for most of the
information here. Certain floral
varieties of honey may differ markedly from these averages,
and we will make an effort to
note when those differences should have noticeably good or
bad effects on your mead
making efforts.
OVERVIEW
Honey is obviously the product of the collection of nectar by
honeybees. Not much is
known about nectar. Perhaps the government does not think
that it is worth the effort to
collect it the way it pretty much has to be collected: one
bee-full at time. Nectar is a complex
sugar blend consisting primarily of sucrose, as well as
levulose and dextrose. The bees add
enzymes, and transfer the nectar to a honey stomach from
which it is regurgitated into cells
in the comb when they return to the colony. Additional
enzymes are added, the cells are
hermetically sealed, and the honey is then permitted to
"ripen," meaning that the enzymatic
activity occurs which gives the honey its final sugar blend.
Bees do also collect pollen,
which provides the protein portion of their diet, but pollen
is not integral to the production
of honey. The nectar source determines most of the variable
characteristics about honey,
including sugar balance, color, scent and flavor. The F.D.A.
holds that a plant or blossom
must serve as the chief floral source in order for the honey
to be labeled as such.
The vast majority of beekeepers fall into the hobbyist/part
time beekeeper category, with
fewer than 25 hives. These apiarists account for 50% of the
colonies in the country, and
about 40% of domestic production. The average colony produces
just under 70 pounds of
honey per year. An estimated 3.2 million colonies produced
roughly 250 million pounds of
honey with a value of about $124 million.[3]
Others, and probably more important when
one wishes to obtain a single source honey, are professional
pollenators. These are
individuals who provide a valuable service to fruit growers
by bringing their bees which
pollinate their trees and plants. A by-product of this
pollenation is a single source honey.
Honey is quality graded into four classes which are based on
a combination of flavor,
clarity, absence of defects and moisture content. For our
purposes, we would recommend
using only Grade A (Fancy) or Grade B (Choice). This will be
expanded on this later.
Honey is color graded into seven categories by the U.S.D.A.,
and these do not have any
bearing on quality. Honey should not be judged on the basis
of color, as some of the most
distinctively and strongly flavored honeys, such as basswood,
are very light, while very
mild and pleasant honeys such as tulip poplar can be quite
dark. Honey color is based on
the Pfund Scale in millimeters; the common names for the
range of standards from lightest
to darkest are: Water White, Extra White, White, Amber,
Amber, and Dark Amber. Honey
has an average specific gravity of 1.41, which gives it a
weight of about 11 pounds, l2
ounces to the gallon. Although the sugars in honey have more
sweetening power, due to
moisture content, honey matches the sweetening power of
sucrose (table sugar) pound for
pound.
COMPOSITION AND ORGANOLEPTlC EFFECTS
Water
The moisture content of honey plays a critical role in its
quality. Honey is very
hygroscopic, which means that it will absorb moisture from
the air. Honey, on the average,
contains 17.2% water by weight. Grades A and B must not have
more than 18.6%
moisture. Grade C honey can contain up to 20% water, and we
do not recommend it for
mead making.
The reason that the moisture content of honey is important is
that all unpasteurized honey
contains wild yeasts. Due to the high sugar concentration,
these yeasts will pose little risk
in low moisture honey because osmosis will draw sufficient
water from the yeast to force
them into dormancy. In honey that has a higher proportion of
water, the yeast may survive
and cause fermentation to begin in storage.
Sugar
Honey is comprised of many sugars, and their percentages and
ratios are dynamic
dependent on floral variety and storage. The primary sugars[4]
contained in honey are shown
below on Table 1.
Table 1. Average Sugar content of Honey
Levulose
(d-fructose)3 8.2%
Dextrose
(d-glucose)e 31.3%
Sucrose
(table sugar) 1.3%
Maltose
(& other disaccharide) 7.3%
Other higher sugars 1.5%
The "other higher sugars" which have been identified in honey
are considered to be the by-products of
enzymatic activity. Since enzymatic activity
begins at collection and continues
from the sealing of the comb through the extraction and
storage process, these sugars will
inevitably be present to some degree. They include erlose,
kojibiose, maltotriose,
isomaltose and a host of others. Virtually all of the sugars
found in honey are fermentable.
Acid
Honey's acidity is masked by its sweetness, but it is
considerable. The pH of honey ranges
from 3.4 to around 6.0, with the mean and mode both being
around 3.9. It is important to
note that the pH of honey does not directly reflect the total
acid content, but rather reflects
the buffering action of the inorganic cation constituents on
the organic acids present.
The primary acid in honey is gluconic acid, and acids account
for 0.57% of honey. Other
acids include citric, malic, succinic, formic, acetic,
butyric, lactic, pyroglutanic, and
various amino acids. Acid content and variety in honey is
very important to its flavor
profile.
Proteins, Solids and Mineral Content
Proteins, and other solids make up 0.26% of honey, and
include all of the nitrogen that
your honey provides for the yeast nutritional requirements
other than that which they
synthesize themselves. The number and nature of the protein
content is very complex with
at least 19 proteins present in addition to albumin.5,6
Protein varies widely between that
honey varieties. Total nitrogen averages 0.043%. Mineral/ash
content contributes 0.17%
by weight, and while the mineral content is not substantial,
darker honeys have been
shown to be substantially richer in minerals than lighter
honeys, particularly potassium,
chlorine, sulfur, sodium, iron, manganese and magnesium.
Enzymes
Enzymes[7] are very critical ingredients in honey. The sucrose
contained in floral nectar is
converted into dextrose and levulose (the invert sugars) by
the enzyme invertase, also
known as saccharase or sucrase. Invertase activity is
believed to begin in the bee, and
continues indefinitely barring excessive heat exposure.
Diastase is also present in honey,
along with glucose oxidase, catalase and phosphatases.
Colloids
Colloids are suspended materials in a given medium, in our
case honey. They do not settle
out, and are not readily filtered. Colloids must be assumed
to have appreciable affect on
honey flavor, and consist of proteins, waxes, pentosans and
inorganic constituents. They
appear to originate both in the bee and from the floral
source.
Flavor and Aroma Substances
Sadly, the finest reference materials available on honey are
inconclusive on the actual flavor
causing substances in honey[8]. It has been well documented
that honey will take on many of
the flavor and aroma characteristics of the floral source
from which it is produced.
Obviously, the predominating flavor of honey is the complex
sweetness arising from the
blend of levulose, dextrose, maltose and other sugars. This
blend can vary substantially by
floral source; the range of maltose runs from below 4% to
above l2%, and the higher
sugars ranged from 0.13% to 8.6%. These variances will have
an impact on the
fermentation process and its by-products in mead.
Additionally, the range of mineral content is equally wide.
While there are exceptions to the
rule, the higher mineral contents are paired with darker
color and higher pH readings. The
mineral content may actually provide valuable nutrients for
the yeast during its activity. In
general darker honey has been described as being stronger in
flavor, and this may be the
result of that higher mineral content. Sulfur, for example
has been shown to exceed aroma
thresholds in dark honey. To further compound the situation,
sodium (a flavor enhancer)
has been shown to reach 400 ppm in the darker honeys, and to
be greater than 4-fold
higher than that of lighter honey. The averages for potassium
are more than 8-fold higher in
dark honey than in light.
Other potentially influential flavor components would include
the acids and their ratios,
tannins, and glycoside or alkaloid compounds contributed to
the mix by the floral source.
Another known and recognized flavor contributor is 5-
hydroxymethylfurfural, or HMF. It
is a by-product of the decomposition of sugars in the
presence of acids. and is a detrimental
to honey flavor at higher concentrations. HMF should be
below 40 ppm.
The information on aroma substances is far more complex . It
leans toward the phenyl
alcohols and carbonyls. ten Hoopen[9] isolated
dinitropenylhydrazones by chromatography,
including formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone,
isobutyraldehyde and diacetyl. Cremer and
Riedmann[10] identified phenylethyl alcohol, propionaldehyde
and acetone, and later n-pentanol, benzyl alcohol and 3-methyl-1-butanol. These
compounds were present in all of
the honeys which they found to be organoleptically
recognizable as honey. Phenylethyl
alcohol oxidizes down to phenylacetic acid, and nearly all
phenylacetic esters have been
described as having a honey taste and odor.
Other aroma constituents identified include the carbonyls
butyraldehyde, Isovaleraldehyde,
methacrolein, and methyl ethyl ketone. Alcohols include
isopropanol, 2-butanol, ethanol
and beta methylallyl alcohol. Esters identified were methyl
and ethyl formate.
The compounds dominating the list are phenolic in nature, and
could account for some of
the phenolic character attributed to meads, particularly
young meads. Most of these
compounds have boiling points below 180 F, and would be
subject to rapid blow-off
during boiling. It would also stand to reason that the
character which these compounds
create would also be bound to the colloidal substances held
in suspension in unheated and
unfiltered honey.
Inhibine
Since ancient times, the antibiotic effects of honey have
been recognized by the medical
community. - In 1937 Dold[11] and others measured and
documented the effect, and called it
"inbibine". 25 years later, Dr. Jonathan White and others
isolated the exact cause of the
anti-bacterial effect: the glucose oxidase in the honey
produces hydrogen peroxide as it acts
on glucose to produce gluconolactone (gluconic acid). This
enzyme is heat sensitive, and
concentration varies with floral type.
VARIATION OF COMPOSITION BY FLORAL VARIETY
The variable composition factors which affect honey and
fermentation are: Moisture content
(lower moisture means higher percentage of sugar content),
Percent dextrose (lower
dextrose means lower crystallization), Complexity of sugar
blend (higher concentrations of
maltose and other sugars make for more complex flavor and
aroma variations. This usually
also corresponds to lower dextrose levels), pH (affects
fermentation and flavor profile),
Total Acid content (flavor), Ash (mineral content - affects
aroma, flavor and fermentation)
and nitrogen content (fermentation). This data is presented
on Table 2.
Total acids are expressed as millequivalent/kilogram; it
reflects amount of cationic charge
produced by the acids in the solution. The average for the
490 samples was 29.12; we have
weighted our assessment of each honey's acidity against that
value.
Table 2. Honey constituents by variety expressed as a
percentage
Citrus Clover Fireweed Mesquite Rasp. Sage
T.Pop Tupelo
Moisture 16.5 17.7 16.0 15.5 17.4
16.0 17.6 18.2
Levulose 30.9 37.9 39. 3 40.4 34. 5
40.4 34.6 43.3
Dextrose 32.0 31.0 30.7 36.9 28.5
20.2 25.9 26.0
Sucrose 2.8 1.4 1.3 0.95 0.5 1.1 0.7 1.2
Maltose 7.2 7.7 7.1 5.4 5.7 7.4 11.6 0.0
High.Sug. 1.4 1.4 2.1 0.35 3.6 2.4 3.0 1.1
pH 3.84 3.77 3.03 4.20 4.04 3.51 4.45 3.87
Total acid 30.34 26.53 26.77 16.33
39.19 29.10 42.99 36.59
Ash 0.073 0.071 0.108 0.129 0.471 0.108
0.460 0.128
Nitrogen 0.014 0.039 0.032 0.012 0.076
0.037 0.076 0.046
- Citrus:
- By analysis of the numbers, citrus honey appears to be an
excellent candidate for brewing.
While the dextrose level is a bit high, moisture is low, pH
is in the middle, and ash content
is very low. The low nitrogen content might dictate higher
than normal yeast nutrient use.
Citrus honey of any blend is marketed as "Orange Blossom,"
and is light in flavor and very
aromatic. Micah Millspaw has made some excellent mead from
orange blossom honey.
- Clover:
- The values shown here are for sweet clover honey, and the
U.S.D.A. has several dozen
specimens profiled in their bulletin. Moisture levels tend to
run on the high side, making
clover honey a candidate for quick use. As with most of the
lighter flavored honeys, ash
content is low, as is total acid content, which would
contribute to a softer flavor profile. It
looks like a great case honey for flavored meads.
- Fireweed:
- Other than slightly lower than normal total acids and ash,
fireweed honey looks like a very
average honey. Fireweed honey did not express a dramatic nose
or flavor, and doesn't
seem to create much of a stir as a mead.
- Mesquite:
- Not one of our experimental honeys, but a good candidate by
the numbers. High pH is due
to lack of total acid, not high ash buffering. This honey
should ferment well with a healthy
dose of nitrogen and no pH adjustment. Low moisture and acid
content make for higher
sugar content by weight. Low ash should mean light color and
minimal offensive odor or
flavor. Might require some acid before bottling for balance,
especially in sweeter meads.
- Raspberry:
- Very high ash content may make this honey somewhat suspect,
although it expresses a
dynamite nose and flavor out of the jar. Very interesting
sugar blend should create
complexity, and high nitrogen should benefit fermentation.
- Sage:
- Another low ash, middle-of-the-road sugar blend honey. Known
to be light in flavor with a
delicate and inviting aroma. One to be explored.
- Tulip Poplar:
- Tulip Poplar honey is a very distinctive honey in aroma, and
although one of the darker
honeys, has a mild and appealing flavor. Tulip poplar honey
has a high maltose content,
lending to its complexity, and, like other dark honeys, is
high in ash content. Tulip poplar
honey is widely available from the north to the south
throughout the midwest.
- Tupelo:
- White tupelo is the primary source for the light unblended
honey sold as tupelo honey. It
has a very high levulose content, low dextrose and high
maltose count, which make it
attractive to brewers. Low ash, high Acids and moderate pH.
- Wildflower:
- The range of honeys sold as "Wildflower" is too great to he
characterized by one broad
brush statement. The U.S.D.A. included 57 "blend of floral
source" honeys in its study,
with pH values from 3.67 to 5.30, ash contents from. 054 to
.615, and other swings in
other categories. Our experience with the wildflower honey in
our batch was not
particularly favorable, and I suspect too much mineral
content, but some of the honeys had
values which looked very conducive to good mead. Caveat
Emptor.
- Commercially Blended Honey:
- The drawback to much commercially blended honey is that it
has been heat pasteurized,
albeit at temps in the 145 F range. The upside is that the
honey is generally buffered
through blending to a pH around 3.9, is light amber in color
and therefore free of excessive
mineral content, and has been blended to have a neutral
palate and nose. It makes a good
base honey, frequently providing quality grading which
assures low moisture content, and
color grading for ease of use and good record keeping.
Other Interesting honeys
Several other honeys stood out in the study as having
interesting characteristics.
- Japanese Bamboo: High Maltose, higher pH, low to medium ash,
high nitrogen.
- Alfalfa: high dextrose, low ash, low nitrogen.
- Blackberry: High pH (5.0), high Maltose (11.3%), high ash,
high nitrogen.
- Blueberry: High Maltose, low acid, higher pH, high nitrogen.
- Chinquapin: Low moisture, low dextrose, high maltose, very
high
other sugars, very high ash (.761%).
- Gallberry: Low acid, higher pH (4.2).
- Black Locust: High maltose, very low acid (15.54), very low
ash (.052%), low nitrogen.
- Peppermint: High pH (4.7), high acid, very high ash (.473)
- Prune: High moisture, high maltose, pH 6.0!, acids very low
(11.80), ash .694%
- Sourwood: dextrose low, maltose very high, pH 4.53, acids
16.95, ash slightly high. Very
interesting candidate. Highly respected among honey
authorities.
- Vetch, hairy: Average sugar values, low pH, low total acids,
very low ash, low nitrogen.
SOURCES OF HIGH QUALITY, FRESH HONEY
Due to the unstable nature of honey, the finest honey for
brewing will be honey which is
fresh, and which has been extracted and packaged by a
beekeeper who is concerned with
the parameters of moisture content and attention to floral
variety documentation which will
allow you to be consistent with your recipe formulation. With
more than 200,000 small
scale beekeepers in the country, the likelihood of finding
one in your area should be very
high. If you have a local beekeepers supply retailer, he
should be able to give you the
names of reputable local beekeepers. We also suggest that
you call your state's agricultural
extension service. They can provide information on potential
honey suppliers, as well as
information on beekeeping clubs, which can in turn provide
information on varietal honey
production in your area[12].
Beyond that, however, there are other methods of securing
fresh varietal honey in bulk at
reasonable prices. Farmers' markets generally have at least
one quality honey provider;
Detroit's Eastern Market has four. If you develop a
relationship with a packager, he will
frequently be more than happy to keep you up-to-date on what
is fresh, and which honeys
are particularly attractive at which time of the year. Many
beekeepers will have a first
extraction of water white premium honey during the spring,
and we have found this to be
an excellent source of brewing stock.
Local suppliers are unlikely to provide a full range of
floral varieties, and for that you will
need to contact a good packer.
The National Honey Board has a Honey Suppliers Directory
which provides tremendous
information. Good bulk suppliers would be the Bees Knees
Honey Factory in Portland,
Oregon or the Glorybee Sweetener Company in Eugene; Dutch
Gold Honey in Lancaster,
Pennsylvania; Sandt's Honey in Easton, Pennsylvania;
McClure's Honey and Maple
products in Littleton, New Hampshire; Highs Hill Honey in
Crossville, Tennessee, and
Drapers Super Bee Apiaries in Middleton Pennsylvania. We are
sure there are others, but
all of these companies list good selections of varietal
honey.
We also suggest you check out the WORLD HONEY JAR, which is
the American Head
Association's publication on high quality varietal honey
sources. The A.M.A. is reachable
at PO. Box 17511, Boulder, CO 80308.
STORAGE AND STABILITY
Honey is not widely considered to be a fragile substance, but
for the purposes of brewing,
it should be considered as such. The volatility of the aroma
constituents makes
pasteurization an unappealing option, and there are a number
of other problems which can
result from age and improper storage.
From the time the honey is produced by the bee, its
constitution is in a constant state of
change. Invertase is continually working on the sucrose
content to convert it to levulose.
There is additional evidence to indicate that as much as 9%
of the dextrose may be
converted to more complex sugars, thus changing the balance
of levulose to dextrose.[1]
Additionally, gluconic acid is a primary by-product of the
invertase conversion process,
and other acids may be added to the blend as the result of
additional enzymatic activity.
Some honeys have an appreciable increase in acid content
during storage. Diastase, due to
its own instability, will tend to decrease in storage, and
color in virtually all honey stored at
room temperature will darken.
Perhaps the most hazardous of all storage problems is
granulation or crystallization. Honey
granulates by building up dextrose around a "crystal nucleus"
of a dextrose crystal, dust
particle or pollen grain, and will crystallize most rapidly
when stored at temperatures
between 50 F and 60 F, (the optimal temperature for
initialization of crystallization is 41 F
to 45 F). Crystallization is particularly hazardous to
unpasteurized honey because the
concentration of solids around the crystal creates a higher
moisture content (above asthe
critical 18 - 19% level) in the residual uncrystallized
honey. This in turn promotes
fermentation, resulting in alcohol and, in the presence of
oxygen, the alcohol will break
down to acetic acid and water. If crystallization is present,
and a distinct separation of
solids and liquids is apparent, your honey is at distinct
risk of fermentation. The end result
is honey which is sour and definitely not conducive to
premium mead creation. The moral
of the story is, don't buy your honey in August, put it in
the basement at 55 degrees for
months, and then haul it and brew with it when its old and
crystallized. Unless it's there
and the only option is tossing it.
All of these problems can be avoided through immediate use of
fresh honey, or through
proper storage of your honey. The ideal temperature for long
term storage is 0 F or below,
as honey kept at very low temperatures, even for prolonged
periods, shows little or no
degradation of flavor, color, aroma or its other physical
properties. If freezing is not an
option, short term storage between 61 F and 80 F is the best
option, and storage above 80
F will cause particularly rapid deterioration of color,
flavor and enzyme content.
SANITATION METHODS
Heat
There is a continuing battle over the practice of eliminating
risk of infection by a full boil or
by heating to a lower temperature for a prolonged period. The
Pros of boiling include
guaranteed elimination of biological contaminants and the
proverbial "hot break" which will
remove protein and other colloidal materials in the honey,
and the potential for using your
heat to sanitize fruit or other potentially infecting
ingredients. The negatives include the
driving off of all volatile aroma compounds, which give fresh
honey its distinctive aroma.
On the other side of the debate is "super-heating," which is
generally agreed to be effective
if done to the 190 F range for 10 to 20 minutes. I have used
this method with good results,
however there is evidence to indicate that the wisdom
regarding superheating may not be
correct. Initially, I would state that the hygroscopicity,
low pH and hydrogen peroxide
content make honey a poor candidate for bacterial infection.
Therefore the biggest danger of
infection comes from the wild yeasts which are present in
honey, especially that honey
extracted from combs which spent a long period of time
unsealed or stored in the hive,
such as honey from the previous growing season. Yeast counts
can range from 0.1/gram to
100,000/gram, making yeast control a major consideration.
Minimum Conditions Required to Kill Yeasts in Honey
The temperatures and exposure times needed to kill yeasts in
honey have been proven to be
far lower than we mead makers have been using. Dr. White has
noted that honey heated at
145 F for thirty minutes will be free of yeast contamination.
The actual time required to kill
yeast is 22 minutes at 140 F, and drops well below 5 minutes
at 150 F and above. Using
temps in the 145 F range will preserve many of the aroma
compounds, and cuts down on
time, fuel usage and the hazards of dealing with large
volumes of boiling-hot concentrated
sugar water. As shown in the following graph, sufficient
pasteurization may be achieved
in as little as 1 minute at 155F. (Data taken from White,
J.W., The Hive and The Honey
Bee, pp 513.)
Sulfites
The use of Sulfites to produce quality meads has the
advantage of ease and lack of heating
(avoidance of driving off desirable aroma compounds, no color
change). The minimum
threshold for adequate sanitation is 70 ppm, which equates to
0.4 grams per gallon at pH
3.5. We have seen and tasted many superior meads produced by
this method; Dr. Bill
Pfeiffer, a past A.H.A. National Homebrew Competition Head
Maker of the Year swears
by it, and his meads are wonderful.
Nothing
No sanitation at all is one of the experimental efforts which
we intend to pursue, but if you
are interested in using this method, we would recommend that
you make an effort to obtain
honey which you know was produced and capped by the bees in
short order. This could be
accomplished by finding a local beekeeper who is using his
hives for pollination of high
nectar producing species such as citrus or tupelo.
Sterile Filtration (Ultrafiltration)
We have had the chance to taste some of the meads produced by
Dr. Robert Kime, Cornell
University. He is the foremost advocate of ultrafiltration[13],
which involves filtering with a
50,000 molecular weight filter to eliminate not only bacteria
and yeasts, but all colloidal
materials and some proteins as well. This has produced meads
of astonishing clarity which
are absent of virtually any flavor or aroma defects. His
data indicate that meads produced
by this method are preferred by 80% of a tasting panel when
compared to meads produced
by more conventional techniques.
The drawback of this process, by our subjective analysis, is
that some and perhaps many
of the distinctive and appealing honey characteristics are
also removed. Granted these
meads are smooth and pleasant in a very short period of time,
but some of the character
seems scrubbed out. True, Dr. Kime did win Best-of-Show in
the First Mazer Cup, but the
winner was a pyment of Vignoles grapes, which was very
pleasant and vinous, but not
dominated by honey character. This would lend credence to the
argument that the colloidal
content of the honey has dramatic and important effects on
flavor and aroma. We believe
that Dr. Kime's offerings certainly have commercial
potential, but in much the same way
that most commercial wines have established markets in the
U.S.
GENERAL MEAD REFERENCES
Brewing Mead, Gayre,R & Papazian, C.
All About Mead, Andrews,S.W.
Making Mead, Acton,B & Duncan,P.
Making Wines Like Those You Buy, Acton,B.
Zymurgy
American Mead Association
Mead Lovers Digest
PART 2: AN ANALYSIS OF MEADMAKING
INTRODUCTION
Honey is a remarkable liquid. Made by humble insects, it is
far more than a simple mixture
of sugars. Honey contains, in addition to a rather complex
mixture of sugars, enzymes,
proteins, organic compounds and trace minerals. It is these
interesting compounds, present
in minute quantities that give honey its distinctive flavor
and characteristic aromas. Many
of these are carried over into a mead produced from these
honeys and lend a similar,
recognizable distinction to the finished mead. To produce a
high quality, complex beverage
from honey it is our aim to preserve as much of these
distinctive flavors and aromas as is
possible.
The subtle nature of honey allows a great deal of latitude in
additives designed to enhance
the character and complexity of mead. We have experienced a
great number of fruits,
vegetables, herb and spices added to a basic mead with both
overt and subtle results. Thus
the addition of various materials leads to a subset
categorical divisions. Show mead is
defined as a beverage produced by the fermentation of honey
alone. Nutrients and additive
are allowed, but no additional spices, fruits or herbs. In
traditional mead small amounts of
fruits, spices and herbs are allowed, but they must never
overpower the honey flavor and
aroma. These additives are to play a supportive role at or
below the taste threshold.
Pyments, Cysers and Melomels are meads which include the
addition of grapes, apples and
other fruits respectively. Metheglin is a mead to which
spices have been added. Hippocras
refers to a spiced pyment, and finally Braggot is a
concoction consisting of honey and malt
sugars. Clearly there can be many subclasses of these
categories, and therein lies the
challenge in judging a mead competition. For instance, how
and in what category should
one judge a cherry braggot,or who determines the threshold
levels of a spice?
The history of honey and the making of mead is a long and
rich one, but unfortunately
outside of the scope of this article. An excellent source by
Gayre[14] has been recently
published and is highly recommended reading.
HONEY
Many authors recommend the use of fresh honey that has
undergone the least processing
possible. With this information we heartily concur. Honey
blends may be consistent, a
good base honey for fruit meads, and offer repeatable
results, but it is our contention that
far more interest, variety and complexity can be achieved
through the use of pure honey
sources. These can then be blended by the meadmaker to
adjust deficiencies, dilute over
range constituents or add pleasing aroma and flavor
combinations.
WATER
Water for mead making varies both due to the source and to
the composition of the mead.
Honey contains quite variable concentrations of minerals and
ash, water contains quite
variable concentrations of minerals. The secret lies in
selecting a honey/water combination
hat provides an acceptable balance in the finished mead.
High mineral waters clearly are
not desired in high ash honeys. Conversely, since yeast
requires a certain amount of
minerals to prosper, a low ash mead and a low mineral water
would also prove
unacceptable.
NUTRIENTS
Yeast require nitrogen in the respiratory phase of growth.
Since honey is a poor source of
nitrogen mead fermentations without adequate nutrition are
notoriously slow. The addition
of yeast nutrients (diammonium phosphate), yeast energizer
(diammonium phosphate,
magnesium sulfate, yeast, folic acid, niacin, sodium
pantothenate and thyamine) or yeast
hulls is very important to promote complete fermentation.
These materials are readily
available and their use is encouraged.
ACID
The use of acids citric, malic, tartaric, acid blend, or
lemon juice has been recommended by
many authors to balance any residual sweetness in the
finished mead. We agree that some
sweet/acid balance is desirable, but feel that it is
optional. Furthermore, the addition of
acids pre-fermentation can reduce the pH of the honey must,
resulting in a sluggish
fermentation. The pH of honey is already low, and since
there is very little buffering
capacity, when fermentation commences, the pH drops to a
range at which the yeast slows.
We will expand on this point in the following section. It
has been our experience that
addition of acid to a finished mead is a more reliable method
to achieve the desired
sweet/sour balance.
TECHNIQUES
Among the more controversial topics in mead production is
that of treatment of must prior
to fermentation. We will discuss the benefits and drawbacks
of many of the methods
available to the small scale producer. These methods include
boiling, sulfiting,
pasteurization, sterile filtering and no treatment
whatsoever. Many excellent texts are
available that provide step-by-step methods to produce high
quality meads.[15]
Many authors have advocated boiling the must. While this
technique does possess some
distinct advantages as far as coagulation and subsequent
protein removal is concerned,
resulting in a more rapid clarification, there are valuable
losses of aroma components that
are driven off in the boil. A technique in which the must is
briefly boiled, just long enough
for the coagulated protein to be removed then rapidly
chilled, offers a good compromise.
This method is simple and straight forward and the authors
continue to recommend it to
beginning mead makers with good success.
The use of Sodium metabisulfite or Campden tablets offers the
distinct advantages of no
heating and thus no aroma volatilization. This method is
also the most rapid in that the
honey may be simply mixed with water and then sulfated.
Yeast may be pitched the
following day. Major disadvantages are that some people are
sensitive to these
compounds, proper adjustment of addition requires both an
accurate scale and an accurate
pH meter and these compounds tend to bleach fruit. Another
disadvantage is that the
proteins are not removed and the meads may require fining to
clarify.
The pH of the must effects the amount of free SO2 present,
thus must be taken into
account. Table 2 shows the recommended levels of SO2 to
treat white wine and these
values may be directly substituted in a mead. Although these
values represent the optimal
levels of sulfite, the authors tend to err on the short side
of the equation, adding at most 1
Campden tablet/gallon. Each Campden tablet contains 0.44
grams of sulfite, so for those
that have an accurate balance the weight in grams of sodium
or potassium metabisulfite may
be calculated from the table.
Table 2. pH effect on sulfite additions[16]
pH of must ppm SO2 tablets/gallon
3.0 40 2/3
3.2 60 1 1/3
3.4 70 1 1/2
3.6 80 1 2/3
3.8 120 2 1/2
Pasteurization is the method recommended by the authors. It
is safer, more rapid and less
equipment dependent than other methods and offers a
compromise between sanitization and
loss of aroma compounds. A disadvantage is that the proteins
are not removed and the
meads may require fining to clarify. For the experimental
batches made in preparation for
this article we simply brought the water to a boil and added
the honey, allowing the
temperature to settle at approximately 160F. In retrospect,
this may have been somewhat
higher than needed as data from White3 suggests that as
little as 22 minutes at 140F is
sufficient to kill wild yeasts.
FERMENTATION
A major issue in mead fermentations is the notoriously long
time it can take to reach
completion. Fermentation rate is dependent to some extent of
the honey variety, but
through proper selection of yeast strains, agitation during
fermentation, yeast nutrition and
control of pH, one can dramatically increase the fermentation
rate. Therein lies another
controversy; clearly, commercial operations are interested in
rapid fermentations. As small
scale mead makers, perhaps the economics of capital tied up
in fermenters is not so
problematic. Of more significance is the effect on flavor.
There are some that find the
flavor of mead that has had a long, slow fermentation on the
yeast objectionable due to the
taste associated with autolysis. Others find the taste
familiar and similar to that of a fine sur
lie Champagne in which the toasty/yeasty flavor of autolysis
is a welcome and integral part
of the taste profile. The authors prefer a more relaxed
approach which favors long
fermentations, although recently we have been experimenting
with accelerated methods.
The single most significant factor effecting the rate of mead
fermentation is yeast health.
This may be ensured by providing adequate nutrients in the
form of yeast energizer and
yeast nutrients well as careful monitoring of the pH
throughout the fermentation. Most of
the required nutrients are available in the commercial
preparations, but other additional
nutrients that may be helpful such as biotin, pyridoxine and
peptone. Morse[17] found that
the most rapid fermentations were achieved when a balanced
salt, buffer and nutrient
additive was used. They report fermentations to 12% alcohol
in less then 2 weeks by using
6.75 g/L of formula 1 and 0.25 g/L of formula 2 as shown
below on Table 3.
Table 3. Nutrient Mixtures for Mead Fermentations.
Formula 1 Formula 2
Component Weight/gr. Component Weight/mg
ammonium
sulfate 1.0 biotin 0.05
K3PO4 0.5 pyridoxine 1.0
MgCl2 0.2 mesoinositol 7.5
NaHSO4 0.05 Calcium
pantothenate 10.0
citric acid 2.53 thiamin 20.00
sodium citrate 2.47 peptone 100.0
ammonium
sulfate 861.45
The pH of honey is naturally low and since it is poorly
buffered, upon fermentation the pH
may drop to a point at which the yeast is unable to ferment
efficiently. The addition of a
basic buffer helps greatly by holding the pH to 3.7-4.0
throughout the course of the
fermentation. The authors have had success fermenting a mead
to completion in 2 weeks
simply by providing adequate nutrition (yeast energizer),
oxygen saturation of the cooled
must and the addition of calcium carbonate to hold the pH
above 3.7. Other salts that may
be used include potassium carbonate and potassium
carbonate.[18] Care must be exercised
because all of these salts can add a bitter/salty flavor if
overused and therefore minimum
use of these compounds is recommended.
YEASTS
A large number of yeasts are now available to the small scale
meadmaker for conducting the
fermentation. Most wine yeast strains will perform nicely,
and indeed some are very good
at fermenting low nutrient musts. There are several
commercial sources for high quality
mead yeasts and most of these are now available as pure
cultures on slants, thus eliminating
bacterial contamination commonly encountered in the dry yeast
packets. We have
discovered, however, that bacterial contamination is a minor
issue in mead fermentations.
Of far greater consequence is the potential for post-
fermentation contamination during
processing or storage with acetobacter species that may
result in the production of honey
vinegar. Most of these problems can be prevented with good
sanitation practices,
prevention of aeration during transfer or preventing oxygen
from reaching the mead by
keeping carboys or barrels filled.
Since meads generally start out with high sugar content (on
the order of 20%) it is prudent
to pitch a large volume of yeast, we recommend pitching the
slurry from a starter prepared
that is 10% of the volume of the main fermentation.
THE EXPERIMENT
On May 2nd 1993 we made 65 gallons of mead in a single, long
afternoon. All yeast was
obtained through Yeast Lab or The Yeast Culture Kit Company,
and all were pure cultures
from slants or normal production runs in the case of Yeast
Lab M61 and M62. All honey
was obtained locally or by mail order and in each case we
attempted to purchase the least
processed form. In many cases this was unfiltered and
unprocessed therefore we were
handling crystallized bricks rather than liquids. All meads
except batch 13 were made to
the same recipe: 2.5 lb/gal honey, 0.4 t/gal malic acid, 0.4
t/gal tartaric acid, 0.4 t/gal yeast
nutrient and 0.2 t/gal yeast energizer. OG fell in the range
of 1.092 to 1.094, pH 3.55-4.0,
TA 0.2-.25. For the blended batch (13) we added all the
remaining honey leftovers and
then diluted with water to obtain an OG of 1.130. The
procedure was the same for all
batches: we brought the proper amount of acid treated water
to a boil, added the honey and
allowed it to pasteurize for 15 min. at 160-170F, cooled to
70F and ran it out into a carboy.
Here is an outline of the project:
# gal Honey Variety Yeast
1 5 Clover Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
2 5 Clover Yeast Lab M62-sweet mead
3 5 Clover Yeast Culture Kit Co.-Riesling
4 5 Clover Yeast Culture Kit Co.-Epernay
5 5 Clover Yeast Culture Kit Co.-Prisse de Mousse
6 5 Clover Yeast Culture Kit Co.-Tokay
7 5 Wildflower Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
8 7.5 Fireweed Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
9 5 Orange blossom Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
10 5 Snowberry Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
11 5 Wild Raspberry Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
12 5 Starthistle Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
13 7.5 Blended Yeast Lab M61-dry mead
We used four 15.5 gal stainless steel kettles equipped with
either propane or natural gas
burners. Crystallized honey proved to be difficult to work
with on the 60 lb scale. The
only other minor problem aside from slight confusion during
visitation by neighbors (what
ARE you doing?), friends (so what is the OG, TG, TOH, style
of beer, of this batch?),
daughters (Daddy PLAY with me), wives (explicative deleted)
and occasional hungry
hornets (Yikes), was a live ant that was fished out of the
cooled honey must. After a short
dinner break at 8PM (we barbecued chicken at the same time),
we had everything washed
by 9PM. All carboys were carried down into the basement and
the yeast cultures pitched at
9:30. Arranging and re-arranging the carboys on the floor so
they sat on an insulation of
Styrofoam, produced a pleasing array of hues that ranged from
almost water-white
(starthistle) to amber (wild flower). After pausing to
ponder and admire the magnitude of
our work, we parted, very tired but very satisfied.
Fermentations were all active within 12 hours and were
allowed to proceed at ambient
temperatures until the following Spring. The ambient
temperature ranged from 50 to 70F
depending on the season and was complete by the end of the
summer. We made no attempt
to achieve a rapid fermentation in this experiment. Two of
the batches spontaneously
cleared at 7 months: those clover meads fermented with
Eperney and Prisse de Mousse
yeast. All were treated with Bentonite and racked to
secondary the following winter. No
further clarification was seen, therefore Sparkeloid was
added to all of the carboys.
Absolute clarity was observed within 4 days in all batches.
The individual batches were racked to a kegs, blanketed with
CO2 and allowed to
condition at cellar temperatures. We have done some taste
tests on the finished meads and
will share the analysis and the meads at the 1994 AHA
National Conference.
REFERENCES
- 1. White, J.W.Jr.,et al., Composition of American Honeys,
USDA Technical Bulletin #1261, 1962.
- 2. White, J.W.Jr., Honey, Adv Food Res., 24:287-374, 1978.
- 3. Humann, M., Honey Industry Facts, National Honey Board,
Longmont, CO. 1991.
- 4. White, J.W.Jr., The Hive and the Honey Bee, .
- 5. Marshall, T., Williams, K.M., "Electrophoresis of honey:
characterization of trace
proteins from a complex biological matrix by silver staining",
Anal Biochem.,
167(2):301-3, 1987.
- 6. Bergner, K.G., Diemair, S., "Proteins in honey. I.
Separation and concentration
of proteins in honey", Z Lebensm Unters Forsch, 157(1):1-6,
1975.
Bergner, K.G., Diemair, S., "Proteins in honey. II. Gelchromatography,
enzymatic acitivity and origin of honey-protein", Z Lebensm
Unters Forsch,
157(1):1-6, 1975.
- 7. Stadelmeier, M., Bergner, K.G., "Proteins of bee honey.
VI. Isoelectric focusing
of amylase in various kinds of honey," Z Lebensm Unters
Forsch, 182(1):25-8, 1986.
- 8. Crane, E., Honey, A comprehensive Survey, Heinemann,
London, 1979.
- 9. ten Hoopen, T., From Crane, E., Honey, A comprehensive
Survey, Heinemann,
London, 1979.
- 10. Cremer, From Crane, E., Honey, A comprehensive Survey,
Heinemann, London,
1979.
- 11. Dold, From Crane, E., Honey, A comprehensive Survey,
Heinemann, London,
1979.
- 12. Who's Who In American Beekeepimng, Gleanimgs In Bee
Culture, 3-7, 1992.
- 13. Kime, R., McLellan, M.R.&Lee, C.Y., "Ultra-filtration of
Honey for Mead
production", Agricult. Research, 15:517, 1991.
- 14. Gayre, R., Wassail in Mazers of Mead, Brewers
Publications, Boulder, CO,
1986.
- 15. Papazian, C., Brewing Mead, Brewers Publications,
Boulder, CO, 1986.
- 16. Cox, J., From Vines to Wines, Garden Way Publishing,
Pownal,Vermont, 1985.
- 17. Morse, R.& Steinkraus, K.H., "Wines from the Fermentation
of Honey", In: Honey
- 18. Moorhead, D., "The Relationship of pH and Acidity in
Wine", In: The Complete
Handbook of Winemaking, G.K.Kent, Ann Arbor, MI, 1993